What gets in the way today
- Too many candidate formulations and too few lab slots
- Simulation that is too slow or too approximate to trust
- No way to defend why one candidate went forward
Materials & chemicals
Know which formulation to make before you make it.
Every candidate you synthesise costs weeks of lab time and budget. We rank candidates first, check the ranking against the method you use today, and send only the lead to the lab.
What you get
- A ranked shortlist before synthesis
- The baseline each ranking was checked against
- A plain answer when your current method is good enough
The evidence
- 4 of 4 formulations ranked in the right order on quantum hardware, every energy difference within 0.3% (protocol frozen before the run).
- Chemistry at 40 qubits, about twice the published scale, every step within chemical accuracy of its exact reference.
- Award winner, 2nd place worldwide, GIC 2026 Advanced Materials track (Mitsubishi Chemical Group × AIST). A judged result; it does not imply endorsement of any product.
StatusMeasured on quantum hardwareClassical computation
Read the case
Platform network result
Chemicals / manufacturing
Chemical-plant production planning
Planning time 2–6 h → 1–10 min, including verification
- Condition
- Baseline: the prior manual or spreadsheet planning. Multi-grade (100+ grades) scheduling. Self-reported in a customer interview.
- Compute
- Classical solvers · no quantum hardware
- Status
- Field, in production use
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Decide before you build.
Bring us the decision you have to make next.
We tell you which option wins, and whether quantum is the reason.
No keyNo cardAn answer in about a second