Use cases
Two kinds of evidence, kept apart: our own work, and results delivered through our platform network. Clients are anonymised by industry.
Our work
Our own measurements and computations: the problem, what we did, an impact box with conditions, and a status line.
Semiconductors · materials
Resist candidates ranked before any were made, so only the lead goes to synthesis and wafer testing.
Measured on quantum hardwareClassical computationRead the story
Within 1.4% of exactPharma · life sciences
Candidate allosteric sites read from a structure file alone, with the site model validated against exact references. A method result: no drug-ranking gain is claimed.
Measured on quantum hardwareClassical computationRead the story
Mobility · autonomy
A disturbance model measured on a 128-qubit processor was the only one that certified a controller safe at its operating point.
Measured on quantum hardwareClassical computationRead the story
Energy · networks
A network-expansion plan shown optimal over every one of more than a million alternatives, plus a direct read of the network’s real-time response.
Classical computationMeasured on quantum hardwareRead the story
Finance · financial crime
A method for reading collective behaviour in payment networks. We measured where pairwise models go wrong; no detection gain is claimed.
Measured on quantum hardwareClassical computationRead the story
Mobility · aerospace
A flow-transport solver mapped to the logical-qubit scale at which we will test it against the classical solver, running today across seven hardware platforms. No advantage on present hardware is claimed.
ProjectionRead the storySecurity · post-quantum
A dated risk window for each cipher in your estate, so the post-quantum migration is planned and budgeted rather than rushed.
Our assessmentRead the storyThrough our platform network
Seven cases delivered through our platform network. Partners and clients are not named. Each metric is quoted as published, with its baseline, its compute type and its status. They are not presented as our own measurements.
Chemicals / manufacturing
Planning time 2–6 h → 1–10 min, including verification
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Automotive / materials
Score 123.5 vs 100.5 (NSGA-II) and 76.2 (TPE) in a 60-second run; reached NSGA-II's 60-second score in about 10 s
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Mobility / smart city
−20% vehicle waiting time vs the conventional method
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Telecom
Average downlink throughput about +10%
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Energy
25,755 variables and 48,939 constraints; quantum solutions were feasible
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Energy / utilities
More than 7× the probability of finding the optimum vs the unoptimised quantum workflow
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Cross-industry optimisation
Up to about 80× faster than a commercial solver and more than 3× faster than simulated annealing, in time to an approximate solution
Does not show that quantum beats classical.
Through our platform network · partner and client not named
Decide before you build.
We tell you which option wins, and whether quantum is the reason.
